Page Loader

CATEGORY ARCHIVES: Landmark Judgements

01 Aug
1

A Debenture Holder of a Qualifying Floating Charge cannot appoint an Administrator where there are pending insolvency proceedings

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

In Re: Arvind Engineering Limited ML HC IP No. 03 of 2019 [2019] eKLR the High Court also held that where there’s any pending insolvency proceedings, the Debenture Holder once made aware of such proceedings ought to remain in those proceedings and make arguments for or against th...

01 Aug
3

A Court cannot arrogate itself original jurisdiction simply because claims and prayers in a dispute before it are multifaceted

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

The Supreme Court in ascertaining the position of judicial abstinence, as with judicial restraint also known as the Pullman doctrine in Benson Ambuti Adega & 2 Others vs Kibos Distillers Ltd & 5 Others [2020] eKLR upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision in finding that the...

01 Aug
3

The holder of a Debenture created prior to the coming into effect of the Insolvency Act (Act No.18 of 2015) (the Act) qualifies to appoint an Administrator under the provisions of section 534 of the Act

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

In Re: Arvind Engineering Limited ML HC IP No. 03 of 2019 [2019] eKLR the High Court held that the holder of a debenture whose instruments empowered them to appoint a Receiver-manager under the Repealed Act is deemed to have powers to appoint an administrator under the Insolvency...

01 Aug
4

Employees on probation have a right to fair administration action and a right to fair hearing: Section 42(1) Of the Employment Act 2007 is unconstitutional

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

In the Employment and Labour Relations Court in Nairobi Petition number 94 of 2016 Monica Munika Kibuchi & 6 Others vs Mount Kenya University & Another, the Court declared that Section 42(1) of the Employment Act which excludes application of section 41 when terminating p...

01 Aug
2

Advocates Cannot Be Charged for Doing Their Work

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

On 1st July 2021, In the case of Henry Aming’a Nyabere V DPP (2021) eKLR, at Nakuru High court, a landmark ruling was delivered by learned Judge Hon. Prof Joel Ngugi on the propriety of charging Advocates in criminal suits for doing their work. The learned Judged observed...

01 Aug
2

Virtual spaces legal venues for the purposes of convening meetings in the era of COVID

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

Though by way of consent, the Court in HC Misc Application No E680 of 2020 entered the first of its kind decision, that online platforms and digital meeting solutions qualified as “venue” for purposes of convening a meeting. Arising in the time of COVID-19, the matter was...

01 Aug
2

Legislative power in this country belongs in the sharing hands of two Houses-National Assembly cannot preclude the senate in legislation

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

The Court of Appeal nullified 23 Acts of Parliament for being unconstitutional in a move that aimed to solidify the constitutional necessity for concurrence between both houses of Parliament in compliance with Art5icle 11(3) of the Constitution of Kenya (2010) in the judgement of...

01 Aug
2

Judicial Review not only looks into procedural fairness but also merit

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

On the 7th May 2021, a three-judge bench of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi in the matter of Judicial Service Commission & another v Lucy Muthoni Njora [2021] eKLR pronounced itself on among others the issues whether the Courts in cases of Judicial Review have any place making...

01 Aug
2

A consent agreement is solemn, and courts are required to adopt to once informed and bring the dispute to a close, and not engage in academic deliberations over settled disputes

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

In Geoffrey M. Asanyo & 3 others v Attorney General [2018] eKLR, the Supreme Court grappled with two questions; when does a consent by the parties transmute into an Order of the Court? What is the role of the Court in the adoption of the consent? The Petitioners sought...

01 Aug
0

The Supreme court has jurisdiction to review its judgments and rulings, but only in exceptional circumstances.

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

The Supreme Court in the matter of Fredrick Otieno Outa v Jared Odoyo Okello & 3 others [2017] eKLR settled the question whether it has jurisdiction to review its own Judgments, Rulings or Orders, and if so, what is the scope of such jurisdiction? The Court made the in...

01 Aug
0

No automatic right of appeal lies to the Court of Appeal against the High Court’s decision on an application seeking to set aside an arbitral award

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

The Supreme Court of Kenya, on Friday 6th December 2019, circumscribed a narrow jurisdiction for the Court of Appeal, to be where the High Court makes a manifest error of law. In its judgment in Nyutu Agrovet Limited v Airtel Networks Kenya Limited; Chartered Institute the Court...

01 Aug
0

Convicted murderers in Kenya, no longer face a mandatory Death Sentence

AcelitigatorAdmin
Landmark Judgements

On 14th December 2017 the Supreme Court in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another v Republic [2017] eKLR altered the mandatory death penalty for convicted murderers and held that the mandatory death sentence is “out of sync with the progressive Bill of Rights” in Kenya’s 2010 Co...

Acelitigator. All rights reserved.