Should lawyers represent persons accused of crimes such as murder, economics crimes even in the face of clear evidence of wrongdoing?
This was the poll question conducted on our social media platform whose results so far are as follows:
poll resultsThe results resonate with the public notion that lawyers should not take on cases of persons whose evidence of wrong doing is glaring. Unfortunately, these perceptions of differ from what the law provides when it comes to arrested and accused persons. They have a myriad of rights.
Take for instance, Article 50 of the Constitution of Kenya obligates the State to ensure access to justice for all persons. Should there be a requirement for payment of fees, the same must be reasonable and not impede access to justice.
The right to prompt information in a language that they understand of the following:
To be brought before a court as soon as reasonably possible, but not later than-
During their first court appearance, to be charged or informed of the reason for continued detention or to be released.
A person shall not be remanded in custody for an offence if the offence is punishable by a fine only or by imprisonment for not more than six months.
Further, Article 48 of the Constitution which provides that an arrested person has:
Back to our poll results, would you change your response after reading the rights provided by law to the accused persons?